FANDOM


Discussion

A topic that's been brought up to me is what kind of content will be allowed here. What kind do you think? PG and down? All the way up to the R rating? Discuss below.--Eu(Talk!Contribs) 18:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

PG

I say we only have PG rated material and down. Warriors is a childrens' series. Therefore, all fan fiction should be able to be read by a 4th grader at least without any inappropriate material. Parents would not be happy at all if we have inappropriate content on here- believe me... So I say I think all material should be rated "PG" or lower. --TC14 19:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

PG-13

I think that some violence in Warriors might get up to PG-13 rating. And some younger children (maybe 4th grade) have already seen PG-13 stuff. But, this would be just for violence, because the cats live violent lives. —Preceding unsigned comment added by *swifty* (talkcontribs)

IMVHO

(in my very humble opinion) I don't think it's even possible for Warriors to get past a PG-13 rating. There's no language, no sex, there's only some blood and violence. Although I suppose that it's sometimes capable of getting to R through violence alone (remember Hawkfrost's death?). Anything up to, say, a high PG-13 should be allowed, but with warnings the way we have now. Ravenflight92 Woodenshippers Unite! 18:45, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Admins

(S) - I'm not sure where I should put this, but here goes. I know I haven't been on this wiki that long, and I don't get on that much, but I've seen a couple discussions on the nominations for sysops and such, and it seems to me that there ought to be some sort of way to either stop people from reading the comments under their section or not to react as strongly as they do. I just went to Sparrowsong's webpage and realized she quit the wiki because of some of these discussions, and while I realize someone who would quit the wiki because of comments on a talk page may not deserve to be admin, there have been a lot of fights between users because of that. I'm not sure what should be done about it - holding discuusions on the IRC wouldn't work too well - but it's a problem that needs fixing. Just want to get that out there. {{SUBST:User:Mosswisker&Stealthfire/Sig}} 21:26, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Stealh Have you seen my talk page? Not that i want to bring it up but i know exactly what you mean SandI'm a new level of awesome 21:30, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Stealth, you're way behind. xD Raidsin the forest 21:33, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

(S) - Yeah LOL, I've got so m uch homework. Plus I only started getting active recently. {{SUBST:User:Mosswisker&Stealthfire/Sig}} 12:34, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

(S) But what are we doing about it? {{SUBST:User:Mosswisker&Stealthfire/Sig}} 12:36, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Stealth, that's something I've been thinking about a lot lately. As of now, we have no way to actually communicate with our voices, which do actually have a lot of needed attitude. As for now, I advise just having fun and writing, and if you see anything, please (PLEASE) tell me or Sunny. Raidsin the forest 19:20, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.