Warriors Fanfiction
Register
Advertisement
Closed-1 This page is currently closed. Please check back in soon!

This is where users may request rollbacker rights.

Rules[]

  • You may not nominate yourself
  • Another user must nominate you, and have your permission to be nominated
  • You cannot ask/beg users to nominate you
  • Family members cannot nominate you
  • Your nomination must be approved by 2/3 admins, or it will not even be put on the page. 
  • If the nomination gets more "Against" votes than "Support" votes, the nomination will be declined.
  • If you vote Against/Support you must put a reason why and leave your signature

Requirements[]

  • You must have been on the wikia for 9 months
  • You cannot have been banned or warned over two times
  • You must have at least 1,000 edits (Most of those edits must be mainstream edits)

Nominations[]

Start a new Nomination[]

To start a nomination, you must put a message on the Request for User Rights Talk Page in this format: 

(Name of User): Rollback Nomination[]

  • Name of user you are nominating
  • Reason
  • Your signature

Once it is approved by 2/3 admins, the nomination will be put on the page and undergo the voting process.

Examples[]

(If you are nominating somebody)

RandomContributor99: Rollback[]

  • RandomContributor99
  • He is a very reasonable user who gets along with many others. He knows when to be stern, and would benefit the wikia greatly.
  • (Signature of User)

(How the Nomination will look on the page if approved)

RandomContributor99 (Nominated by Wetstream)[]

Reason For Nomination:

He is a very reasonable user who gets along with many others. He knows when to be stern, and would benefit the wikia greatly.

Support

This user is a very kind guy! He's helped me out many times and guides the new users in the right direction. He's always there to lend a helping hand and would make a fantastic Rollback. (Signature of User)

Against

This user is very nice, but can sometimes be too nice. He wouldn't be intimidating for vandals or spammers. His activity isn't very high either. (Signature of User)

Rollback Nominations[]

ACCEPTED Rainsplash987: Rollback (Nominated by Bluestar&Brightheart[]

Reason for Nomination:

Rainsplash is a nice user, who's kind to everyone. She knows when to be stern, and knows how to be adminy. She's very reasonable with everything she does, and I think that this wiki would benefit from having her here as a rollback. She's been here since July 2012, and she certainly knows the rules. I believe that she would be an excellent choice for a rollback. 

Support:

I support this, because Rainy is a kind, lovely, very mature person who I have never seen argue with anyone on the wiki (no, seriously) and is often active. She's very understanding, so should have no trouble sorting out problems, she has a decent knowledge of HTML, so coding isn't an issue, and I have no doubt that she can come up with snappy retorts to vandals. She's been here for over a year, and lost her noob status well before that, not to mention she's well-liked and respected by all of the users of the wiki. I feel that she'd be the best choice for this position. Zaffie is the Worranaut! 21:49, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

I support this because 1) I nominated her, and 2) She is everything you could want in a rollback. She's stern when necessary, but she's also understanding and kind. She's respected by everyone I've ever met, and she knows the rules like the back of her hand. She can deal with drama, and anything that's bothersome. (I know she already does), and I believe she would be the best choice for a rollback. She's active, and I know she can deal with problems that may arise. Hush Now Close Your Eyes Before The Sleep 02:49, November 18, 2013 (UTC)

I support this. Like Zaffie said, Rainy is super nice and kind but she knows how to deal with a vandal or troll if needed. She's well respected and mature, knows a great deal about the wiki. And I think that she's really understanding, and most importantly, active. I can't say much else without repeating myself, but the point is that I think Rainy would be an excellent choice. Look before you listen because light comes before sound 02:54, November 18, 2013 (UTC)

I support too (Firey not Stormy, we have the same siggie). Rainy's nice, and definitely mature anough to handle anything thrown at her. She's had experience, and it ready for this job. Her temper is well-controled, and she knows lots of people on the wiki, so she could help lots of people.

Look before you listen because light comes before sound 03:53, November 18, 2013 (UTC)

All I'm going to say is hell yeah. Metaphorically, this ghost is you 18:48, November 18, 2013 (UTC)

I support this because Rainy is a truly amazing person. She's one of the best friends I've ever had - nice, but knows how to react in a tough situation. Rainy is quite active, and has experience from being an admin on a few other wikis. Rainy would be a great addition to the staff. --


Enemies of the heir....Beware... 14:28, November 23, 2013 (UTC)

Against:

I agree with all the above comments and I have nothing whatsoever against Rainy. Rainsplash stern, nice and responsible, but she is already an admin on NightClan Roleplaying Wiki. Being an admin on an RP wiki is a very hard job, and NightClan is a huge site with many users and cats that need seeing to. Rainsplash might find it hard to manage both this wikia and the other one where she is head admin.

(NB: Sorry about formal names but this a formal page so i decided it was appropriate)



SimonI was reborn this way 16:33, November 23, 2013 (UTC)


I agree that Rainy is lovely and a great admin, but I tend to agree with HIMG up there. 

NightClan is an extremely stessful place (trust me, I know from experience) and Rainy is the head admin there. She's already stressed enough as it is having to deal with the drama phase on NightClan. I don't think she could handle being an admin on two highly-active wikis just at the minute, especially since this one has had its fair share of drama. 

TangleXBlue I luffles you Bluestar!  09:16, November 24, 2013 (UTC)

I am not against Rainy. She is pretty nice and would make a great administrator, but I agree with HIMG and Tangle.

She is already admin of NightClan. That place is very dramatic and causes a lot of drama and stress for an admin who works there.

It would feel pretty tough to operate on two wikias at once. It wouldn't be fair for Rainy to sort out stubs on WFW and fix up roleplaying rules on NightClan.

This is just my opinion. I am, once again, totally not against Rainy. She is lovely, and she is already a great and caring admin on NightClan. Would it be fair if Rainy was forced to work as an administrator on two wikis at once? No. That is my opinion. Everyclaw,every tooth,every whisker,Now fight. 06:05, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Advertisement