User blog comment:Forestpaw13/IRC Controversy/@comment-4721006-20120106233108

My honest opinion on all this, and correct me if I'm wrong, because I am a total newbie: Both sides of this argument cancel each other out. They are both pretty silly, as I see it. Let's start off with Echo.

There really isn't any reason to have a big freak out. I mean, I get super mad to if things don't go my way. But you have to think about this -- there is always a reason for banning. You obviously broke a rule of some sort, and wether you agree with that broken rule or not is not for you to say. Forest is the admin here, and you have to agree with her. She has a reason for banning, and since she has that power, don't argue with her about it. She is doing the best for the site, and you were extremely rude to her about it. It was uncalled for, and immature. Forest: I'm leaning toward agreeing with Echo, just because the way you handled her insults, which were mean and wrong, was also wrong. A photo block. Not sure why you had one, but I'm sure their was a reason and I won't argue. You seem to notice every grammar mistake she makes -- 'I see that comma splice and flinch every time.' You call her rude, and she was being rude, yes, yet you say that? I would feel insulted for you pointing that out to me to. It's all in *HOW* you say it and not *WHAT* you say. Oh, she made one mistake! *Faint*

And yeah, your pissy attitude in this kind of annoys you. Both of you are wrong, so leave it be.