User blog comment:Wetstream/Unsuccessful/@comment-2169873-20100913235937

Hmm. I'll have to think that one through, Sunny. It'd be hard to make it fair. Going through randomly means half of them will probably be a story that will never be completed/ just the allegiances. I would say grab some of the newer ones, but then that's not fair to the older. And the most popular are already on the Editor's pick ones/Highest Voted (which seems to change by the second). I think it'd be better for the Content section to contain stories that are a good length in or series with at least one story done and an active user, just to make sure people who start reading them don't read a story that will never be completed, you know? Aside from that, maybe nominations/ peer recommendations? Plus, stories on the nominations page will also be more likely to be read since its another form of advertisement, and voters will want to check them out. I think that'd be two birds one stone, if you ask me. And the changes would prevent one story from always getting the spotlight. Just a suggestion, although it's not new material.